Ye Mei1,2*
1 Qingdao Harbor Vocational &Technical College, Port and Shipping Logistics, Qingdao, Shandong province, 266404, China
2 College of Arts and Sciences Education, Trinity University of Asia, Manila 1102, Philippines
AbstractAs an institutional innovation platform for deepening industry-education integration, the scientific governance model of modern industrial colleges directly determines the alignment efficiency between talent cultivation and industrial demands. This study systematically traces the evolutionary trajectory of China’s modern industrial college governance models through the trident spiral synergy theory and stakeholder theory, categorizing them into three phases: resource-sharing, co-development, and industry-led. Through case analysis of nine representative institutions, the study identifies three governance paradigms—teaching-point oriented, enterprise-oriented, and hybrid—each characterized by distinct features. An evaluation system is established with four secondary indicators (governance responsibility, governance structure, governance mechanism, and governance effectiveness) and twelve tertiary indicators. Using enhanced fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and entropy value methods for indicator weighting, the results reveal governance responsibility (34.91%), governance effectiveness (25.757%), and governance mechanism (25.681%) as core dimensions. Finally, four optimization pathways are proposed across resource integration, decision-making enhancement, efficiency improvement, and accountability reinforcement to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for high-quality development of modern industrial colleges.
Keywords1. Wu Y, 2021, The Development Situation and Tasks of Higher Education in the New Era. China Higher Education, 2021(1): 4-8.
2. Zadeh LA, 1965, Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8(3): 338-353.
3. Zhonghua Z, Huang X, Lei Z, 2025, Development Strategies and Practical Exploration of Modern Industrial Colleges in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Modern Vocational Education, 2025(22): 81-84.
4. Huang JL, 2025, Dilemmas and Optimization Paths of Mixed Ownership Industrial College Development from the Perspective of Property Theory. Education and Vocational, 2025(14): 49-56.
5. Bo J, Sheng L, 2024, Empowering Modern Industrial Systems: Logical Mechanisms, Problem Representation and Reform Approaches in Higher Vocational Colleges. China Vocational Education, 2024(34): 19-26.
6. Ministry of Education, 2020, Construction Guide for Modern Industrial Colleges (Pilot).
7. Huang DR, 2020, Industrial College: The Advanced Form of Industry-education Integration in Vocational Education. China Higher Education, 2020(15): 24-26.
8. Wang JH, 2020, Modern Transformation of University Governance Structure. Education Research, 41(5): 38-47.
9. Liu XJ, On the Modernization of Governance Capacity in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Higher Education Research, 42(2): 1-9.
10. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L, 2000, The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-industry-government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2): 109-123.
11. Freeman RE, 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
12. Ge GF, 2025, Sustainable Development of Modern Industrial Colleges in Higher Vocational Education: Connotation, Dilemma and Strategy under the Perspective of Repetitive Games. Research on Higher Engineering Education, 2025(4): 144-148+153.
13. Zhang HF, Zhang B, Zhang YP, et al., 2024, Strategic Ecology Positioning of Specialized Industrial Colleges in Higher Education for Cultivating Emerging Industries. Journal of Higher Engineering Education, 2024(4): 106-110.
Copyright: © International Society for Translational Sciences, except Open Access articles