The present study was conducted with the aim of educational small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in healthcare sector and mapping future developed education and training. Therefore, the effects of seven pillars of sustainability (7PS) model including environment, economic, social, educational, cultural, technical, and political aspects on future sustainability of educational SME for nurses have investigated. A structured questionnaire survey was conducted and multi-criteria decision-making method was used to rank effects of the seven pillars. The results showed that technical, educational and cultural aspects have the most effect on sustainability of educational SMEs for Nurses in Iran, respectively. Accessing to educational content and analysis enables nurses deepen their knowledge which makes the technical and educational aspects of 7PS more highlight for nurses. Moreover, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic made tele-learning and social network tools as integral component of the nurses' educational systems.

1. Cook P, Nixson F. Finance and small and medium-sized enterprise development. 2000: Citeseer.

2. Chen IJ, Yang KF, Tang FI, Huang CH, Yu S. Applying the technology acceptance model to explore public health nurses' intentions towards web-based learning: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(6):869–878.    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.11.011

3. Liang JC, Wu SH, Tsai CC. Nurses' Internet self-efficacy and attitudes toward web-based continuing learning. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(8):768–773.    DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.021

4. Triacca L, Bolchini D, Botturi L, Inversini A. MiLE: Systematic usability evaluation for E-learning web applications. Accessed January 18, 2023. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/20638806.pdf

5. Yue LQ, Plummer V, Cross W. The effectiveness of nurse education and training for clinical alarm response and management: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(17-18): 2511-2526.    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13605

6. Doost Mohammadian, H. Mapping the future sustainable, through the 5th wave/tomorrow age theory or theory of comprehensive everything with a focus on educational SMEs. IEEE conference, Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2022.

7. Kermansaravi F, Navidian A, Navabi Rigi S, Yaghoubinia F. The relationship between quality of work life and job satisfaction of faculty members in Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. Glob J Health Sci. 2014;7(2):228–234.    DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p228

8. Darvishi A, Yousefi M, Dinan MM, Angelstam P. Assessing levels, trade-offs and synergies of landscape services in the Iranian province of Qazvin: towards sustainable landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 2022;37(1):305-327.    DOI: 10.1007/S10980-021-01337-0

9. Shafiee M, Yazdanian V. Concept Development of Industry-University Collaboration: From Practical-oriented to the Structural-Oriented Methods. Iran J Eng Educ. 2008;9(36): 81-110.

10. Chang SH. The technology networks and development trends of university-industry collaborative patents. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;118:107–113.    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.006

11. Villani E, Rasmussen E, Grimaldi R. How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;114:86-102.    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.004

12. Rajalo S, Vadi M. University-industry innovation collaboration: reconceptualization. Technovation. 2017;62/63:42–54.

13. Wang Q, Ma J, Liao X, Du W. A context-aware researcher recommendation system for university-industry collaboration on R&D projects. Decis Support Syst. 2017;103:46–57.    DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2017.09.001

14. Azagra-Caro JM, Barberá-Tomás D, Edwards-Schachter M, Tur EM. Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: a case study of the most highly cited academic patent. Res Policy. 2017;46(2):463–474.    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.011

15. Shahverdian N. Information and Communication Technology Usage Among High School Teachers in Tehran, Iran. Universiti Putra Malaysia. 2010. (Thesis)

16. Jones J, Corral de Zubielqui G. Doing well by doing good: a study of university-industry interactions, innovationess and firm performance in sustainability-oriented Australian SMEs. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;123:262–270.    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.036

17. Criveanu M, Iacob C. Role of Management Control in Small and Medium Enterprises Performance Assurance, in Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series. University of Craiova. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration; 2011.

18. Garcia-Perez-de-Lema D, Madrid-Guijarro A, Martin DP. Influence of university–firm governance on SMEs innovation and performance levels. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2017;123:250–261.    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.003

19. Fazel A, Kamaliyan AR, Rowshan SA. Identification of Effective Dimensions and Components on Academic Human Resources Empowerment, Emphasizing the Third and Fourth Generation of Universities With Fuzzy Delphi Approach: Presenting a Conceptual Model. Educ Strategies Med. 2017;10(6):455-468.

20. Ahmadi alvar, z., D. Feiz, and M. Modarresi, Meta-Synthesis of Antecedents of Deviant Behavior in Iranian Organizations. Public Administration Perspective, 2022. 13(2): p. 63-89.

21. Liebetruth T. Sustainability in performance measurement and management systems for supply chains. Procedia Eng. 2017;192:539–544.    DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.093

22. Marzban S, Najafi M, Etedal MG, Moradi S, Rajaee R. The evaluation of outpatient quality services in physiotherapy in the teaching health centers of Shahid Beheshti University based on SERVQUAL tools. Euro J Biol Med Sci Res. 2015;3(3):46–53.

23. Gilbert Silvius AJ, Kampinga M, Paniagua S, Mooi H. Considering sustainability in project management decision making; An investigation using Q-methodology. Int J Proj Manag. 2017;35(6):1133–1150.

24. Akhtar CS, Ismail K, Ndaliman MA, Hussain J, Haider M. Can intellectual capital of SMEs help in their sustainability efforts. J Manage Res. 2015;7(2):82.    DOI: 10.5296/jmr.v7i2.6930

25. Büyüközkan G, Karabulut Y. Sustainability performance evaluation: literature review and future directions. J Environ Manage. 2018;217:253–267.    DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.064

26. Ahmadi SAA, Mubaraki H, Askarinejad M. Investigating the effective factors in the intention to leave the service of nurses. Sci J Kurd Uni Med Sci. 2013;7(63):101-110.

27. Yousefian S, Sohrabizadeh S, Jahangiri K. Identifying the components affecting intra-organizational collaboration of health sector in disasters: Providing a conceptual framework using a systematic review. Int J Disast Risk Re. 2021;57:102-146.

28. Teubner G. Corporate fiduciary duties and their beneficiaries. Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities: Legal, Economic, and Sociological Analyses of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1985.

29. Abdin J, Rahman M. Cluster development models: challenges and opportunities. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2015;3(4):358-366.    DOI: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20150304.15

30. O'Farrell PN, Hitchens DN. Alternative theories of small-firm growth: a critical review. Environ Plan A. 1988;20(10):1365–1383.    DOI: 10.1068/a20136

31. Gabe and Davis. Alternative theories of small-firm growth: a critical review. Bus Dev. 1989/1990;2(5):359-385.

32. Hanks S, Chandler G. The growth of emerging firms: a theoretical framework and research agenda. The proceedings of 7th Annual National Conference of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship; 1992.

33. Holmes S, Zimmer I. The nature of the small firm: understanding the motivations of growth and non-growth oriented owners. Aust J Manag. 1994;19(1):97–120.    DOI: 10.1177/031289629401900106

34. Birley S, Westhead P. Growth and performance contrasts between ‘types’ of small firms. Strateg Manag J. 1990;11(7):535–557.    DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250110705

35. Döckel JA, Ligthelm AA. Factors responsible for the growth of small business. S Afr N J Econ Manag Sci. 2015;8(1):54–62.    DOI: 10.22495/jgr_v3_i4_c2_p4

36. Gurlek Kisacik O, Sonmez M, Ozdas A. How attitudes towards e-learning affected the academic achievement during the covid-19 pandemic: an example of a nursing skills teaching. Turk Online J Distance Educ. 2023;24(1):129–144.

37. Mohammadian HD. Mapping the Future SMEs' HR Competencies via IoE Technologies and 7PS Model Through the Fifth Wave Theory. In: Chemma N, El Amine Abdelli M, Awasthi A, Mogaji E, ed. Management and Information Technology in the Digital Era (Advanced Series in Management, Vol. 29). Emerald Publishing Limited; 2022:141–171.    DOI: 10.1108/S1877-636120220000029010

38. Mohammadian HD. An Overview of International Cross-Cultural Management. Fachhochschule des Mitt elstands GmbH; 2017.

39. Mohammadian HD. Internet of Energy: a solution for improving the efficiency of reversible energy. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2018:1890–1895.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363466

40. Mohammadian HD. Internet of Energy: A Solution for Improving the Efficiency of Reversible Energy. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2018.

41. Mohammadian HD. The role of Smartness and Ubiquitous in Industry 4.0 and its effect on SMEs' Human Resource Competencies. FHM University; 2019.

42. Mohammadian HD. Business Sustainability Strategies in Today’s Challenges and Tomorrow’s Crises of Contagion of Covid/Post-Covid19 Era: Education, Skill and Qualification. International Conference: Literature, Language & Education, Business & Management, Science & Technology Conference; 2020.

43. Mohammadian HD. IoT-Education technologies as solutions towards SMEs’ educational challenges and I4.0 readiness. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2020.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125248

44. Mohammadian HD. Tomorrow’s SMEs/hybrid SMEs (SME 5.0): Scenarios, applications and technologies with using the 5th wave theory. Cent Eur Stud London Inst Skill Dev; 2020.

45. Mohammadian HD. Sustainable smart innovative global SMEs. FHM University of Applied Sciences; 2020.

46. Mohammadian HD. The 5th Wave and i-Sustainability Plus Theories as Solutions for SocioEdu Consequences of COVID-19. IEEE conference LWMOOCS VII, Learning with MOOCS 2020; 2020.

47. Mohammadian HD, Rezaie F. I-sustainability plus theory as an innovative path towards sustainable world founded on blue-green ubiquitous cities (case studies: Denmark and South Korea). Inventions. 2020;5(2):14.    DOI: 10.3390/inventions5020014

48. Mohammadian HD, Rezaie F. Global SMEs; Volume 2: SMEs 4.0 to Gain Sustainable Development Globally. FHM University of Applied Sciences; 2020.

49. Mohammadian HD, Rezaie F. Global SMEs; Volume 1: Sustainable Smart Innovative Global SMEs. FHM University of Applied Sciences; 2020.

50. Mohammadian HD. Mapping the future global SMEs growth via hybrid SMEs/SME 5.0/tomorrow’s SMEs concept through the 5th wave, i-sustainability plus and DCT theories. In:Chemma S, Abdelli MEA, Awasthi A, Mogaji E, eds. Management and Information Technology in the Digital Era. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2022:173–206.

51. Mohammadian HD, Bakhtiari AK, Castro M, Wittberg V, Brüggemann T. The development of a readiness assessment framework for tomorrow’s SMEs/SME 5.0 for adopting the educational components of future of I4.0. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2022:1699–1708.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766609

52. Mohammadian HD, Castro M, Wittberg V. Doost sme ranking model (DSRM) for the edu. SMEs development, based on guter mittelstand, MOOCs & related projects as German best practice towards: future edu readiness to achieve SME 5.0. 2022 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2022:161–178.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS53067.2022.9927831

53. Mohammadian HD, Castro M, Wittberg V. Doost sme ranking model (DSRM) for the edu. SMEs development, based on guter mittelstand, MOOCs & related projects as German best practice towards: future edu readiness to achieve SME 5.0. 2022 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2022:161–178.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS53067.2022.9927831

54. Mohammadian HD, Langari ZG, Castro M, Wittberg V. A study of MOOCs project (MODE IT), techniques, and know how-do how best practices and lessons from the pandemic through the tomorrow age theory. 2022 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2022:179–191.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS53067.2022.9927790

55. Mohammadian HD, Rezaie F. Blue-green smart mobility technologies as readiness for facing tomorrow’s urban shock toward the world as a better place for living (case studies: songdo and Copenhagen). Technologies. 2020;8(3):39.    DOI: 10.3390/technologies8030039

56. Mohammadian HD. MOOCs policies on national and international level regarding best practices in German educational SMEs through the 5^th wave theory and 9PSG model. 2022 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS);2022:192–206.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS53067.2022.9927776

57. Mohammadian HD, Mohammadian FD, Assante D. IoT-education policies on national and international level regarding best practices in German SMEs. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON);2020:1848–1857.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125148

58. Mohammadian HD. Education 5.0 & Educational Sustainability through the 5th Wave Theory-Cases: MODE-IT and IoE-EQ. FHM University and London Institute of Skill Development, 2021.

59. Mohammadian HD. Smart governance for educational sustainability: Hybrid SMEs & the 5th wave theory towards mapping the future education in post-Covid era. in IEEE conference, Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), in Tunis, Tunisia. 2022.

60. Mohammadian HD, Shahhoseini H, Castro M, Merk R. Digital transformation in academic society and innovative ecosystems in the world beyond Covid19-pandemic with using 7PS model for IoT. 2020 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2020:112–117.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS50143.2020.9234328

61. González LE, da Silveira P. The people’s attitudes towards global environmental phenomena: a case study. Clim Res. 1997;9:95–100.    DOI: 10.3354/cr009095

62. Farahmand M, Shokoohifar K, Khalaj HS. Study of social factors affecting the studied environmental behaviors: Citizens of Yazd. J Urban Sociol Stud. 2013;4(10):109-141.

63. Briffa J, Sinagra E, Blundell R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon. 2020;6(9):e04691.    DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691

64. Iyigun MA, Owen AL. Risk, entrepreneurship, and human-capital accumulation. Am Econ Rev. 1998;88(2):454–457.

65. [Entrepreneurial Success: The Role of Human Capital and Learning]. Giessener Elektronische Bibliothek. Updated November 09, 2006. Accessed January 18, 2023. http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2006/3805/

66. Lerner M, Haber S. Performance factors of small tourism ventures. J Bus Ventur. 2001;16(1):77–100.    DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00038-5

67. Rezaei J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega. 2016;64:126–130.    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001

68. Zeleny M. Multiple criteria decision making, Kyoto, 1975. Springer Science & Business Media; 1976.    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45486-8

69. Rezaei J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega. 2015;53: 49-57.

70. Alshammari A, Fayez Alanazi M. Use of technology in enhancing learning among nurses in Saudi Arabia; a systematic review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023;16:1587–1599.    DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S413281

71. El Miedany Y. Rheumatology teaching: the art and science of medical education. Virtual reality and augmented reality. Springer; 2019:403-427.

72. Chang HY, Wu HF, Chang YC, Tseng YS, Wang YC. The effects of a virtual simulation-based, mobile technology application on nursing students' learning achievement and cognitive load: Randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;120:103948.    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103948

73. Cheng YM. The effects of information systems quality on nurses' acceptance of the electronic learning system. J Nurs Res. 2012;20(1):19–30.    DOI: 10.1097/JNR.0b013e31824777aa

74. Cengiz Z, Gurdap Z, Işik K. Challenges experienced by nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022;58(1):47–53.    DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12923