Journal Browser
Search
View All
Original Article
Authenticity in educational leadership for health and educational SMEs, through the tomorrow age theory and structural equation modeling for health

Omid Alijani1, Hamid Doost Mohammadian2, Mohammad Rahimi Moghaddam1,3,*

1 Iran SME Chamber, Tehran 16786-53609, Iran

2 School of Business and Economic, Center of Sustainable Governance (CSG) at University of Applied Sciences (FHM), Bielefeld 33602, Germany

3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran



Health Professions Education and Research 2023, 1(1),1-14; https://doi.org/10.54844/hper.2023.0338
Submitted04 Feb 2023
Revised14 Jun 2023
Accepted24 Aug 2023
Published21 Sept 2023
+
Cite This Article
Abstract

Background: The economic record in the world has affected all industries, including the construction industry, forcing them to reduce costs while maintaining quality based on standards. Managing these challenges requires a change in the leadership and management style of construction companies. Authentic Leadership is a method in which leaders are genuine, self-aware, and transparent and emphasize profit and share price over people and ethics. In this paper, we study the authenticity in educational leadership for construction educational Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), through the 5th wave theory and structural equation modeling. Methods: In this paper, structural equation modeling with partial least squares (PLS) approach examines the presented model. The sampling method is enumeration, data is collected by questionnaire, and the collection method is field research. The target society of this section is senior managers, leaders, and owners of 42 construction educational (SMEs) and building mass production in Guilan and Mazandaran provinces (in North Iran besides the Caspian Sea) with more than 15 years of experience. Results: Examination of research’s hypothesis shows that preconditions of authentic leadership, including organizational structure, emotional quotient (EQ), relationship-oriented organizational culture, rules and regulations and ethical reasons of the leader affects enormously authentic leadership. In addition, authentic leadership affects consequences such as staff bullying, extra-role behavior, professional ethics, burnout, job productivity, innovative product, self-control, mindfulness and optimism of the employees. Conclusion: This research shows that the role of authentic leader is undeniable in increasing the employees’ innovation and productivity through unique mechanisms.

REFERENCES
  1. Hashempour R, Ghahremanlou HH, Etemadi S, Poursadeghiyan M. The relationship between quality of work life and organizational commitment of Iranian emergency nurses. Health Emerg Disasters Q. 2018;4(1):49-54.    DOI: 10.32598/HDQ.4.1.49

  2. Pletnev D, Nikolaeva E. Human resources is a key success factor of small and medium sized enterprises in Russia. In: Country Experiences in Economic Development, Management and Entrepreneurship: Proceedings of the 17th Eurasia Business and Economics. Society Conference. Springer; 2017: 443-452.

  3. Sarvari H, Chan DWM, Alaeos AKF, Olawumi TO, Abdalridah Aldaud AAA. Critical success factors for managing construction small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries of Middle East: Evidence from Iranian construction enterprises. J Build Eng. 2021;43:103-152.    DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103152

  4. Hosseinpour I, Soriano C, Almeida MSS. A comparative study for the performance of encased granular columns. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. 2019;11(2):379-388.    DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.12.002

  5. Erik Eriksson P. Improving construction supply chain collaboration and performance: a lean construction pilot project. Supply Chain Manag. 2010;15(5):394–403.    DOI: 10.1108/13598541011068323

  6. Schmidt W. How to choose a Leadership pattern. Harvard Bus Rev. 1958;36:95-101.

  7. Delić M, Slåtten T, Milić B, Marjanović U, Vulanović S. Fostering learning organisation in transitional economy-the role of authentic leadership and employee affective commitment. Int J Qual Serv Sci. 2017;9(3/4):441-455.    DOI: 10.1108/IJQSS-02-2017-0012

  8. Sidani YM, Rowe WG. A reconceptualization of authentic leadership: Leader legitimation via follower-centered assessment of the moral dimension. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(6):623-636.    DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.005

  9. Adil A, Kamal A. Impact of perceived authentic leadership and psychological capital on burnout: Mediating role of psychological ownership. Psychol Stud. 2018;63:243-252.    DOI: 10.1007/s12646-018-0446-x

  10. Anderson HJ, Baur JE, Griffith JA, Buckley MR. What works for you may not work for (Gen) Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. Leadersh Q. 2017;28(1):245-260.    DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001

  11. Aboramadan M, Alolayyan MN, Turkmenoglu MA, Cicek B, Farao C. Linking authentic leadership and management capability to public hospital performance: the role of work engagement. Int J Organ Anal. 2021,29(5):1350-1370.    DOI: 10.1108/IJOA-10-2020-2436

  12. Kim M, Kim YK, Lee HW. It is time to consider athletes’ well-being and performance satisfaction: The roles of authentic leadership and psychological capital. Sport Manag Rev. 2020;23(5):964-977.    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2019.12.008

  13. Sandhåland H, Oltedal HA, Hystad SW, Eid J. Effects of leadership style and psychological job demands on situation awareness and the willingness to take a risk: A survey of selected offshore vessels. Saf Sci. 2017;93:178-186.    DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.12.004

  14. Karam EP, Gardner WL, Gullifor DP, Tribble LL, Li M. Authentic leadership and high-performance human resource practices: implications for work engagement, in Research in personnel and human resources management. Res Pers Hum Resour Manag. 2017;35:103–153.    DOI: 10.1108/S0742-730120170000035004

  15. Wong CA, Laschinger HKS. Authentic leadership, performance, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of empowerment. J advanced Nurs. 2013;69(4):947-959.    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06089.x

  16. Ayça B. The impact of authentic leadership behavior on job satisfaction: A research on hospitality enterprises. Procedia Comput Sci. 2019;158:790-801.    DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.116

  17. Joo BK, Jo SJ. The effects of perceived authentic leadership and core self-evaluations on organizational citizenship behavior: The role of psychological empowerment as a partial mediator. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2017;38(3):463-481.    DOI: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2015-0254

  18. Qiu SP, Alizadeh A, Dooley LM, Zhang RJ. The effects of authentic leadership on trust in leaders, organizational citizenship behavior, and service quality in the Chinese hospitality industry. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2019;40:77-87.    DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.06.004

  19. Braun S, Nieberle KW. Authentic leadership extends beyond work: A multilevel model of work-family conflict and enrichment. Leadersh Q. 2017;28(6):780-797.    DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.04.003

  20. Du Plessis M, Boshoff AB. The role of workplace authentic leadership on followership behaviour and psychological capital in a South African context. In: Cotter-Lockard D, ed. Authentic leadership and followership: International perspectives. Springer; 2018: 81-113. .    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65307-5_4

  21. Dwyer PA, Hunter Revell SM, Sethares KA, Ayotte BJ. The influence of psychological capital, authentic leadership in preceptors, and structural empowerment on new graduate nurse burnout and turnover intent. Appl Nurs Res. 2019;48:37–44.    DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2019.04.005

  22. Valsania E, Moriano SJA, Molero F. Authentic leadership and intrapreneurial behavior:cross-level analysis of the mediator effect of organizational identification and empowerment. Int Entrep Manag J. 2016;12:131-152.    DOI: 10.1007/s11365-014-0333-4

  23. Elrehail H, Emeagwali OL, Alsaad A, Alzghoul A. The impact of transformational and authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: The contingent role of knowledge sharing. Telematics Inform. 2018;35(1):55-67.    DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.018

  24. Gill C, Gardner W, Claeys J, Vangronsvelt K. Using theory on authentic leadership to build a strong human resource management system. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2018;28(3):304-318.    DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.006

  25. Hirst G, Walumbwa F, Aryee S, Butarbutar I, Chen CJH. A multi-level investigation of authentic leadership as an antecedent of helping behavior. J Bus Ethics. 2016;139:485-499.    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2580-x

  26. Luu TT. Linking authentic leadership to salespeople’s service performance: The roles of job crafting and human resource flexibility. Ind Mark Manag. 2020;84:89-104.    DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.06.002

  27. Lyubovnikova J, Legood A, Turner N, Mamakouka A. How authentic leadership influences team performance:The mediating role of team reflexivity. J Bus Ethics. 2017;141:59–70.    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2692-3

  28. Niu W, Yuan QH, Qian SS, Liu ZY. Authentic leadership and employee job behaviors: The mediating role of relational and organizational identification and the moderating role of LMX. Curr Psychol. 2018;37:982-994.    DOI: 10.1007/s12144-018-9937-0

  29. Sendjaya S, Pekerti A, Härtel C, Hirst G, Butarbutar I. Are authentic leaders always moral? . J Bus Ethics. 2016;133:125–139.    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2351-0

  30. Shang Y, Chong MPM, Xu J, Zhu X. Authentic leadership and creativity in China: The role of students’ regulatory-focused behaviors and supervisors’ power sources. Think Skills Creat. 2019;34:100592.    DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100592

  31. Srivastava AP, Dhar RL. Authentic leadership and extra role behavior: A school based integrated model. Curr Psychol. 2019;38:684-697.    DOI: 10.1007/s12144-017-9634-4

  32. Swain AK, Cao QR, Gardner WL. Six Sigma success: Looking through authentic leadership and behavioral integrity theoretical lenses. Oper Res Perspect. 2018;5:120-132.    DOI: 10.1016/j.orp.2018.04.001

  33. Wei F, Li Y, Zhang Y, Liu S. The interactive effect of authentic leadership and leader competency on followers’ job performance: The mediating role of work engagement. J Bus Ethics. 2018;153:763-773.    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3379-0

  34. Weiss M, Razinskas S, Backmann J, Hoegl M. Authentic leadership and leaders’ mental well-being:An experience sampling study. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(2):309–321.    DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.007

  35. Zhang, J, Song LJ, Wang Y, Liu G. How authentic leadership influences employee proactivity: the sequential mediating effects of psychological empowerment and core self-evaluations and the moderating role of employee political skill. Front Bus Res China. 2018;12(1):1-21.    DOI: 10.1186/s11782-018-0026-x

  36. Alshammari F, Pasay-An E, Gonzales F. Emotional intelligence and authentic leadership among Saudi nursing leaders in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J Prof Nurs. 2020;36(6):503-509.    DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.04.003

  37. Sendjaya S, Sarros JC, Santora JC. Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. J Manag studies. 2008;45(2):402–424.    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00761.x

  38. Braun S, Peus C, Frey D. Connectionism in action:Exploring the links between leader prototypes, leader gender, and perceptions of authentic leadership. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes. 2018;149:129-144.    DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.003

  39. Fallatah F, Laschinger HK, Read EA. The effects of authentic leadership, organizational identification, and occupational coping self-efficacy on new graduate nurses’ job turnover intentions in Canada. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(2):172-183.    DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.11.020

  40. Abdi H. Partial least square regression (PLS regression). Encyclopedia Res Methods Soc Sci. 2007;6(4):792-795.

  41. Jr JFH, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications; 2021:384.    DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806

  42. Ab Hamid M, Sami W, Sidek MM. Discriminant validity assessment:Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. J Physics:Conference Series. 2017;890:012163.

  43. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM:Indeed a silver bullet. J Market theory Pract. 2011;19(2):139-152.    DOI: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

  44. Doost Mohammadian H. The role of Smartness and Ubiquitous in Industry 4.0 and its effect on SMEs’ Human Resource Competencies. 1st International Smart Engineering Conference Affiliation: Fachhochschule des Mittelstands; 2019.

  45. Lee SH, Han JH, Leem YT, Yigitcanlar T. Towards ubiquitous city: concept, planning, and experiences in the Republic of Korea, in Knowledge-based urban development:Planning and applications in the information era. Igi Global. 2008:148–170.    DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-720-1.ch009

  46. Seele P, Lock L. The game-changing potential of digitalization for sustainability: possibilities, perils, and pathways. Sustain Sci. 2017;12:183-185.    DOI: 10.1007/s11625-017-0426-4

  47. Doost Mohammadian H. Smart governance for educational sustainability: Hybrid SMEs & the 5th wave theory towards mapping the future education in post-Covid era. 2022 IEEE Conference Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2022: 1916-1926.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766580

  48. Doost Mohammadian H. Mapping the future sustainable, through the 5th wave/tomorrow age theory or theory of comprehensive everything with a focus on educational SMEs. 2022 IEEE Conference Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2022.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766668

  49. Doost Mohammadian H. Mapping the Future SMEs’ HR Competencies via IoE Technologies and 7PS Model Through the Fifth Wave Theory, in Management and Information Technology in the Digital Era. In: Chemma N, El Amine Abdelli M, Awasthi A, Mogaji E, eds. Management and Information Technology in the Digital Era. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2022:141-171. .    DOI: 10.1108/S1877-636120220000029010

  50. Doost Mohammadian H. MOOCs policies on national and international level regarding best practices in German educational SMEs through the 5th wave theory and 9PSG model. 2022 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2022.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS53067.2022.9927776

  51. Doost Mohammadian H, Castro M, Wittberg V. Doost Sme Ranking Model (DSRM) for the Edu. SMEs Development, based on Guter Mittelstand, MOOCs & Related Projects as German Best Practice Towards: Future Edu Readiness to Achieve SME 5.0. 2022 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2022.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS53067.2022.9927831

  52. Doost Mohammadian H, Bakhtiari AK, Castro M, Wittberg V, Brüggemann T. The Development of a Readiness Assessment Framework for Tomorrow’s SMEs/SME 5.0 for Adopting the Educational Components of future of I4.0. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2022.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766609

  53. Doost Mohammadian H. Internet of Education: A Solution for Improving the Efficiency of Reversible Education. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2018.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363466

  54. Doost Mohammadian H. IoT-Education technologies as solutions towards SMEs’ educational challenges and I4.0 readiness. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2020.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125248

  55. Doost Mohammadian H, Doost Mohammadian F, Assante D. IoT-education policies on national and international level regarding best practices in German SMEs. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2020.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125148

  56. Doost Mohammadian H. NEW CONCEPT: Education 5.0 & Educational Sustainability through the 5th Wave Theory-Cases:MODE-IT and IoE-EQ. Applied Research International Conference in Education and Humanities (ARICON); 2021.

  57. Doost Mohammadian H, Rezaie F. Global SMEs; Volume 1:Sustainable Smart Innovative Global SMEs. Fachhochschule des Mittelstands; 2020.

  58. Doost Mohammadian H, Rezaie F. Global SMEs; Volume 2:SMEs 4.0 to Gain Sustainable Development Globally. Fachhochschule des Mittelstands; 2020.

  59. Doost Mohammadian H, Wittberg V, Castro M, Bolandian G. The 5th Wave and i-Sustainability Plus Theories as Solutions for SocioEdu Consequences of COVID-19. 2020 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2020.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS50143.2020.9234360

  60. Doost Mohammadian H. Mapping the Future Global SMEs Growth via Hybrid SMEs/SME 5.0/Tomorrow’s SMEs Concept through the 5th Wave, i-Sustainability Plus and Theories. In: Management and Information Technology in the Digital Era. Adv Ser Manag; 2022: 173-206. .    DOI: 10.1108/S1877-636120220000029011

  61. Doost Mohammadian H. Tomorrow’s SMEs/hybrid SMEs (SME 5.0): Scenarios, applications and technologies with using the 5th wave theory. 2020 The 5th wave/tomorrow age theory International Conference; 2020.

  62. Doost Mohammadian H, Rezaie F. Blue-green smart mobility technologies as readiness for facing tomorrow’s urban shock toward the world as a better place for living (Case studies:Songdo and Copenhagen). Technologies. 2020;8(3):39.    DOI: 10.3390/technologies8030039

  63. Doost Mohammadian H. Sustainable clean mobility and urban planning - responses to sustainable development in social responsibility as a readiness for facing tomorrow’s world crises. The 8th World Sustainability Forum 2020; 2020.

  64. Doost Mohammadian H. Business Sustainability Strategies in Today’s Challenges and Tomorrow’s Crises of Contagion of Covid/Post-Covid19 Era: Education, Skill and Qualification. International Conference: Literature, Language & Education, Business & Management, Science & Technology Conference; 2020.

  65. Doost Mohammadian H, Langari ZG, Wittberg V. Cyber Government for Sustainable Governance: Examining Solutions to Tomorrow’s Crises and Implications through the 5th wave theory, Edu 5.0 concept, and 9PSG model. 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2022.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766774

  66. Doost Mohammadian H, Shahhoseini H, Castro M, Merk R. Digital transformation in academic society and innovative ecosystems in the world beyond Covid19-pandemic with using 7PS model for IoT. 2020 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2020.    DOI: 10.3390/inventions5020014

  67. Doost Mohammadian H, Rezaie F. I-sustainability Plus theory as an innovative path towards sustainable world founded on blue-green ubiquitous cities (case studies:Denmark and South Korea). Inventions. 2020;5(2):14.

  68. Doost Mohammadian H, Langari ZG, Castro M, Wittberg V. A Study of MOOCs Project (MODE IT), Techniques, and Know How-Do How Best Practices and Lessons from the Pandemic through the Tomorrow Age Theory. 2022 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS); 2022.    DOI: 10.1109/LWMOOCS53067.2022.9927790

  69. Assante D, Capasso C, Veneri O, Castro M, Martin S, Doost Mohammadian H. Internet of energy: new scenarios, opportunities, challenges, and educational solutions. 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON); 2021.    DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9453914

  70. Doost Mohammadian H. A multidisciplinary study of the 5th wave theory and the related theories and models in management and humanities. International Research Conference on Management & Humanities (IRCMH). 2020 BOSTON; 2020.

  71. Doost Mohammadian H, Rezaie F. Sustainable innovative project management:Response to improve livability and quality of life: Case studies: Iran and Germany. Inventions. 2019;4(4):59.    DOI: 10.3390/inventions4040059


Copyright: © by the authors. Licensee ISTS. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
TOP