Background: This study aims to investigate the cognitive status and willingness to learn about generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) of science and technology (sci-tech) journal editors, and to propose corresponding training strategies to enhance their core competitiveness and promote the development of sci-tech journals in the artificial intelligence (AI) era. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among editors of Chinese sci-tech journals, focusing on the respondents' understanding and attitudes towards GenAI and its usage boundaries, their willingness to learn GenAI technology, preferences for learning methods, and choices for improving learning outcomes and interest. Results: A total of 238 valid questionnaires were collected. The respondents were primarily female editors aged 31-50 with editorial or associate editor titles. Editors, 98.74% of whom had varying degrees of knowledge about GenAI, and 88.66% of whom believed that GenAI would partially replace their work in the future. Only 10.92% of the editors had a clear understanding of the usage boundaries of GenAI in academic publishing, while 84.87% considered it essential to learn GenAI technology. In terms of learning needs for GenAI technology, the most requested knowledge content was methods, techniques, examples of use and policy regulations, followed by technical theories and historical development processes. The preferred learning formats were on-site centralized training, online expert lectures, watching educational videos, regular training at work units, self-study and practice, and live exchanges with experts. The methods to enhance learning effectiveness and interest, in order of priority, include: establishing a learning communication group for constant updates, applying for relevant research projects, formulating incentive policies by the workplace, forming study groups with colleagues or like-minded peers at work, participating in competitions and awards organized by educational training institutions, and writing academic papers. Conclusion: Sci-tech journal editors have a high level of awareness regarding GenAI but lack knowledge of policy guidelines. They have an urgent need to learn GenAI technology, and it is essential to adopt diversified and practical learning strategies along with personalized learning formats to improve learning efficiency. Encouraging the editorial and publishing societies to lead professional and standardized GenAI training programs, and increasing incentives from relevant organizations and institutions to boost editors' enthusiasm for learning, while emphasizing international training is crucial.

1. Wan YJ, Gu LP. [Analysis of the rights and interests in the scientific journals industry chain under the influence of generative artificial intelligence]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2024;35(10):1365-1373.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202404180381

2. Huang XR, Tian QF, Chen YW, Zhou HC. [The impact and response of artificial intelligence generated content technology on the publication of scientific and technical journal]. Acta Ed. 2024;36(S1):105-110.

3. Chen XF, Shen XB. [Research on the impact, challenges and countermeasures of generative AI in reshaping the science journal industry]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2024;35(7):890-898.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202403150235

4. Jia J, Du SN. [Research on the application of generative artificial intelligence in editing and proofreading of Chinese scientific journals]. Xuebao Bianji Luncong. 2024;(0):568-573.

5. Chen XM. [The influence of generative artificial intelligence technology on academic production and publication of medical science journals]. Acta Ed. 2023;35(S1):132-136.

6. Hong YM, Wang JZ. [Application and thinking on the use of GenAI in scientific journal topic planning—taking new medicine as an example]. Acta Ed. 2024;36(4):439-443.    DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.04.018

7. Huang XS. [Professional sensitivity: The core competitiveness of editors in the era of artificial intelligence]. Publ Ref. 2024;(12):56-59.

8. Liao XH. [A study on the identity of academic journal editors under the wave of generative artificial intelligence]. Acta Ed. 2024;36(S1):114-118.

9. Xie F. [Character reconstruction and ability restructuring: The challenge and response of generative AI to editing work]. Acta Ed. 2024;(3):115-120.

10. Hong YM. [A survey on the needs of researchers to obtain research integrity information based on scientific journal platforms—taking the medical field as an example]. Sch Publ Res. 2024;134-151.

11. Nie LZ, Wang Z. [Challenges of generative AI to data security protection and criminal law response]. Henan Soc Sci. 2025;33(1):56-63.    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-905X.2025.01.007

12. Feng XQ, Shen Y. [Determination of copyright infringement liability of generative AI Service Providers]. Res Rule Law. 2025;(1):46-58.    DOI: 10.16224/j.cnki.cn33-1343/d.20241230.005

13. Mo MD, Zhang HP. [From "empowerment protection" to "integrity protection": paradigm transformation of personal information protection in generative artificial intelligence]. Credit Ref. 2024;42(12):21-29.    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-747X.2024.12.004

14. Liu XQ. [Analysis of publishing house editor training strategies under the background of integrated development]. Publ Ref. 2024;(2):38-40+31.

15. Shi H. [Professional competence building for grassroots librarians: A case study of the Chinese Library Association's continuing education initiative]. Library Sci Res Work. 2023;(4):78-83+89.    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-2363.2023.04.013

16. Tang DJ. [Analysis of advantages of continuing education for professional and technical personnel]. Sci Tech Assoc Forum. 2016;(9):26-28.

17. Liu B. [The promoting effect of the young editors competition on the cultivation of young talents]. Chin J Sci Technol. 2022;33(8):1098-1103.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202203220190

18. Xu HY. [The role of science and technology journal editing competition for young editors and suggestions for improvement]. Acta Ed. 2021;33(2):226-228.    DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.02.025

19. Yang Y, Yan DY, Zeng Q. [A study on the role of science journal editing competitions in cultivating young editors for university journals—taking the fifth science journal young editor competition as an example]. J Cent South Univ (Soc Sci). 2022;56(5):913-916.    DOI: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2022.05.021

20. Observation on the Semiconductor Industry. [Andrew Ng on DeepSeek: China is catching up with the United States in generative artificial intelligence]. NetEase News website. Updated February 1, 2025. Accessed July 12, 2025. https://m.163.com/dy/article/JNAAQTDR0511CPMT.html

21. Hu JY. [The transformation triggered by DeepSeek and prospects for future AI development]. Chin BroadBand. 2025;21(6):163-165.    DOI: 10.20167/j.cnki.ISSN1673-7911.2025.06.55

22. Conroy G, Mallapaty S. How China created AI model DeepSeek and shocked the world. Nature. 2025;638(8050):300-301.    DOI: 10.1038/d41586-025-00259-0    PMID: 39885352

23. Gibney E. China's cheap, open AI model DeepSeek thrills scientists. Nature. 2025;638(8049):13-14.    DOI: 10.1038/d41586-025-00229-6

24. Zhou M, Pan Y, Zhang Y, et al. Evaluating AI-generated patient education materials for spinal surgeries: Comparative analysis of readability and DISCERN quality across ChatGPT and deepseek models. Int J Med Inform. 2025;198:105871.    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105871

25. Sallam M, Alasfoor IM, Khalid SW, et al. Chinese generative AI models (DeepSeek and Qwen) rival ChatGPT-4 in ophthalmology queries with excellent performance in Arabic and English. Narra J. 2025;5(1):e2371.    DOI: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.2371    PMID: 40352182

26. Levy E, Landman B. ChatGP-me? J Med Imag. 2024;11(5):050101.    DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.5.050101

27. Prescott MR, Yeager S, Ham L, et al. Comparing the efficacy and efficiency of human and generative AI: Qualitative thematic analyses. JMIR AI. 2024;3:e54482.    DOI: 10.2196/54482

28. Wu XG. Omissions in STM Trends 2028: Reflections from China. Ed Pract. 2025;3:1.    DOI: 10.54844/ep.2024.0809

29. Su WS, Hwang GJ, Chang CY. Bibliometric analysis of core competencies associated nursing management publications. J Nurs Manag. 2022;30(7):2869-2880.    DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13795    PMID: 36076321

30. Chen X. [The Interpretation, Core Essence and Development Path of National Talent Strategy in the New Era]. J Party Sch CPC Jinan Munic Comm. 2024;(4):33-41.

31. China Association for Science and Technology, Publicity Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, Ministry of Education,Ministry of Science and Technology. [Opinion on Deepening Reform to Cultivate World-Class Sci-tech Journals of China]. China Association for Science and Technology. Updated April 2, 2021. Accessed July 22, 2025. https://www.cast.org.cn/xs/zcfg/YWHD/art/2021/art_3c24b26982554efbac53f672322388c0.html