Journal Browser
Search
View All
The psychology of digital legacy: Conceptual transformation, mechanisms, and implications for well-being

Hui Fa*

Faculty of Health and Wellness, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China


Well-bing Sciences Review 2026, 2(1); https://doi.org/10.54844/wsr.2025.1086
Submitted10 Mar 2026
Revised10 Mar 2026
Accepted10 Mar 2026
Published10 Mar 2026
+
Cite This Article
Abstract

Digital legacy refers to the digital traces individuals leave behind that continue to represent their identities, memories, and relationships after death. This review examines digital legacy from psychological perspectives, focusing on conceptual transformation, underlying mechanisms, and its impact on well-being. Drawing on traditional legacy motives, it integrates existential, relational, and narrative identity theories with digital contexts to explore how digital legacy shapes meaning for both individuals and communities. A temporal-relational framework comprising three phases (creation, co-existence, and reception) is proposed to conceptualize digital legacy as a dynamic psychological ecosystem in which the well-being of legacy creators and receivers is continuously constructed through interaction, reflection, and remembrance. The review highlights both benefits, such as symbolic immortality and emotional continuity, and risks, including anxiety, authenticity loss, and emotional entrapment. Finally, it outlines theoretical and practical directions emphasizing digital legacy, guided co-creation, and ethical design for psychologically healthy engagement with digital legacy in the digital age.

REFERENCES
  1. Akard, T. F., Wray, S., Friedman, D. L., Dietrich, M. S., Hendricks-Ferguson, V., Given, B., Gerhardt, C. A., Hinds, P. S., & Gilmer, M. J. (2020). Transforming a face-to-face legacy intervention to a web-based legacy intervention for children with advanced cancer. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing22(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000000614

  2. Arnold, M., Gibbs, M., Kohn, T., Meese, J., Nansen, B., & Hallam, E. (2017). Death and digital media. Routledge.

  3. Allen, R. S., Harris, G. M., Burgio, L. D., Azuero, C. B., Miller, L. A., Shin, H. J, Eichorst, M. K., Csikai, E. L., DeCoster, J., Dunn, L. L., Kvale, E., & Parmelee, P. (2014). Can senior volunteers deliver reminiscence and creative activity interventions? Results of the legacy intervention family enactment randomized controlled trial. Journal of pain and symptom management, 48(4), 590-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.012

  4. Ando, M., Morita, T., Akechi, T., Okamoto, T., & Japanese Task Force for Spiritual Care. (2010). Efficacy of short-term life-review interviews on the spiritual well-being of terminally ill cancer patients. Journal of pain and symptom management, 39(6), 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.11.320

  5. Bassett, D. J. (2021). Ctrl + Alt + Delete: The changing landscape of the uncanny valley and the fear of second loss. Current Psychology, 40(2), 813-821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0006-5

  6. Beaunoyer, E., & Guitton, M. J. (2021). Cyberthanathology: Death and beyond in the digital age. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106849

  7. Field, N. P., Gao, B., & Paderna, L. (2005). Continuing bonds in bereavement: An attachment theory based perspective. Death Studies, 29(4), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180590923689

  8. Brubaker, J. R., & Callison-Burch, V. (2016). Legacy contact: Designing and implementing post-mortem stewardship at Facebook. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2908-2919. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858254

  9. Brubaker, J. R., Hayes, G. R., & Dourish, P. (2013). Beyond the grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning. The Information Society, 29(3), 152-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300

  10. Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and social psychology review, 14(2), 155-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352321

  11. Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 21(4), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12162

  12. Cerrillo-i-Martínez, A. (2018). How do we provide the digital footprint with eternal rest? Some criteria for legislation regulating digital wills. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(5), 1119-1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.04.008

  13. Chan, C., Zhao, J., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Our journey with an AI assistant offering narrative therapy on WhatsApp. Journal of Social Work Practice, 39(2), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2024.2420314

  14. Clabburn, O., Knighting, K., Jack, B. A., & O'Brien, M. R. (2019). The use of digital legacies with people affected by motor neurone disease for continuing bonds: An interpretative phenomenological analysis study. Palliative medicine, 33(7), 812-822. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216319845805

  15. Coop, H., & Marlow, C. (2019). Do we prepare patients for their digital legacy? A survey of palliative care professionals. Palliative Medicine, 33(1):114-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216318802748

  16. Doyle, D. T., & Brubaker, J. R. (2023). Digital legacy: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610059

  17. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Youth: Change and challenge. Basic Books.

  18. Erdos, D. (2021). Dead ringers? Legal persons and the deceased in European data protection law. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105495

  19. Estill, L. (2019). Legacy technologies and digital futures. In C. Crompton, R. Lane, & R. Siemens (Eds.), Doing More Digital Humanities (pp. 7-24). Routledge.

  20. Fa, H. (2025). The immortality trap: Terror management in the digital context. Death Studies, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2025.2525189

  21. Galvão, V. F., Maciel, C., Pereira, R., Gasparini, I., Viterbo, J., & Bicharra Garcia, A. C. (2021). Discussing human values in digital immortality: Towards a value-oriented perspective. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society, 27(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13173-021-00121-x

  22. Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). #Funeral and instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152

  23. Gibson, M. (2017). Grievable lives: Avatars, memorials, and family 'plots' in second life. Mortality, 22(3), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2016.1263941

  24. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189-212). Springer New York.

  25. Greenwood, D., Long, C. R., & Cin, S. D. (2013). Fame and the social self: The need to belong, narcissism, and relatedness predict the appeal of fame. Personality And Individual Differences, 55, 490-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.020

  26. Heffer, T., Good, M., Daly, O., MacDonell, E., & Willoughby, T. (2019). The longitudinal association between social-media use and depressive symptoms among adolescents and young adults: An empirical reply to Twenge et al. (2018). Clinical Psychological Science, 7(3), 462-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618812727

  27. Hofer, J., Busch, H., Chasiotis, A., Kärtner, J., & Campos, D. (2008). Concern for generativity and its relation to implicit pro‐social power motivation, generative goals, and satisfaction with life: A cross‐cultural investigation. Journal of personality, 76(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00478.x

  28. Hollanek, T., & Nowaczyk-Basińska, K. (2024). Griefbots, deadbots, postmortem avatars: On responsible applications of generative AI in the digital afterlife industry. Philosophy & Technology, 37(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00744-w

  29. Hunter, E. G. (2007). Beyond death: Inheriting the past and giving to the future, transmitting the legacy of one's self. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 56(4), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.2190/om.56.4.a

  30. Hunter, E. G., & Rowles, G. D. (2005). Leaving a legacy: Toward a typology. Journal of aging studies, 19(3), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.08.002

  31. Klass, D. (1996). Ancestor worship in Japan: Dependence and the resolution of grief. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 33(4), 279-302.

  32. Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Sheppes, G., Costello, C. K., Jonides, J., & Ybarra, O. (2021). Social media and well-being: Pitfalls, progress, and next steps. Trends in cognitive sciences, 25(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.005

  33. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518-530. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518

  34. Lifshin, U., Horner, D. E., Helm, P. J., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2021). Self-esteem and immortality: Evidence regarding the terror management hypothesis that high self-esteem is associated with a stronger sense of symbolic immortality. Personality and Individual Differences,175, 110712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110712

  35. Lifton, R. J. (1979). The broken connection: On death and the continuity of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

  36. Lindemann, N. F. (2022). The ethics of 'deathbots'. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(6), 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00417-x

  37. Lingel, J. (2013). The digital remains: Social media and practices of online grief. The Information Society, 29(3), 190-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777311

  38. Lu, J., García-Badell, G., & Rodriguez, J. B. (2025). Digital heritage from a socio-technical systems perspective: Integrated case analysis and framework development. Heritage, 8(9), 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8090348

  39. McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. Guilford press.

  40. McAdams, D. P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 241-261). Guilford Press.

  41. McAdams, D. P., Hart, H. M., & Maruna, S. (1998). The anatomy of generativity. In D. P.

  42. Mahadevan, N., Gregg, A. P., Sedikides, C., & de Waal-Andrews, W. G. (2016). Winners, losers, insiders, and outsiders: Comparing hierometer and sociometer theories of selfregard. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00334

  43. Massimi, M., & Baecker, R. M. (2010). A death in the family: Opportunities for designing technologies for the bereaved. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1821-1830. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753600

  44. Morley, J., Cowls, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps. Nature, 582(7810), 29-31. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01578-0

  45. Morris, M. R., & Brubaker, J. R. (2025). Generative ghosts: Anticipating benefits and risks of AI afterlives. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713758

  46. Nansen, B., Kohn, T., Arnold, M., van Ryn, L., & Gibbs, M. (2017). Social media in the funeral industry: On the digitization of grief. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(1), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1273925

  47. Neimeyer, R. A. (2001). The language of loss: Grief therapy as a process of meaning reconstruction. American Psychological Association.

  48. Neimeyer, R. A., Klass, D., & Dennis, M. R. (2014). A social constructionist account of grief: Loss and the narration of meaning. Death Studies, 38(8), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2014.913454

  49. Newton, N. J., Herr, J. M., Pollack, J. I., & McAdams, D. P. (2014). Selfless or selfish? Generativity and narcissism as components of legacy. Journal of adult development, 21(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-013-9179-1

  50. Odom, W., Banks, R., Kirk, D., Harper, R., Lindley, S., & Sellen, A. (2012). Technology heirlooms? Considerations for passing down and inheriting digital materials. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in computing systems, 337-346. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207723

  51. Odom, W. T., Sellen, A. J., Banks, R., Kirk, D. S., Regan, T., Selby, M., Forlizziv, J. L., & Zimmerman, L. (2018). Designing for slowness, anticipation, and re-visitation: A long-term field study of the photobox. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1961-1970. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557178

  52. Öhman, C., & Floridi, L. (2017). The political economy of death in the age of information: A critical approach to the digital afterlife industry. Minds and Machines, 27(4), 639-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9445-2

  53. Öhman, C. J., & Watson, D. (2019). Are the dead taking over Facebook? A big data approach to the future of death online. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 2053951719842540. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719842540

  54. Pitsillides, S. (2019). Digital legacy: Designing with things. Death studies, 43(7), 426-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2018.1541939

  55. Reinecke, L., & Trepte, S. (2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior30, 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030

  56. Riaz, F., & Mustafa, A. (2025). Digital mourning and the evolution of grief: A review of social media's role in shaping contemporary bereavement practices. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences7, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjahss.2025.v13i07.008

  57. Riggs, M. (2025). Grief in the age of AI: Griefbots and online death spaces. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management19(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v19i1.12430

  58. Sabik, N. J., Falat, J., & Magagnos, J. (2020). When self-worth depends on social media feedback: Associations with psychological well-being. Sex Roles82(7), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01062-8

  59. Santi, F., & Bianchi, D. (2023). Bereavement in the digital age: The challenges of online sharing and digital memory preservation. Medicina historica7, e2023023. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS2.12541

  60. Schreurs, L., Lee, A. Y., Liu, X. S., & Hancock, J. T. (2024). When adolescents' self-worth depends on their social media feedback: A longitudinal investigation with depressive symptoms. Communication Research51(6), 631-659. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241233787

  61. Sligte, D. J., Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2013). Leaving a legacy neutralizes negative effects of death anxiety on creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin39(9), 1152-1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490804

  62. Sokol, L. L., Jordan, S. R., Applebaum, A. J., Hauser, J. M., Forlizzi, J., Cerf, M., & Lum, H. D. (2020). Social media perceptions of legacy-making: A qualitative analysis. Palliative Medicine Reports1(1), 326-330. https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2020.0069

  63. Solomon, S., & Thompson, S. (2019). Secular cultural worldviews. Handbook of terror management theory (pp. 287-302). Academic Press.

  64. Sri Takshara, K., & Bhuvaneswari, G. (2025). The role of death technologies in grief: An interdisciplinary examination of AI, cognition, and human expression. Frontiers in Human Dynamics7, 1582914. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2025.1582914

  65. Thornham, H., & McFarlane, A. (2011). Cross-generational gender constructions. Women, teenagers and technology. The Sociological Review59(1), 64-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01992.x

  66. Verduyn, P., Ybarra, O., Résibois, M., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well‐being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review11(1), 274-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033

  67. Wade-Benzoni, K. A., Sondak, H., & Galinsky, A. D. (2010). Leaving a legacy: Intergenerational allocations of benefits and burdens. Business Ethics Quarterly20(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20102013

  68. Waggoner, B., Bering, J. M., & Halberstadt, J. (2023). The desire to be remembered: A review and analysis of legacy motivations and behaviors. New ideas in psychology, 69, 101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.101005

  69. Wisman, A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2005). From the grave to the cradle: Evidence that mortality salience engenders a desire for offspring. Journal of personality and social psychology89(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.46

  70. Wyatt-Brown, A. M. (1996). The literary legacies: Continuity and change. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging20(3), 65-68.


Copyright: © by the authors. Licensee ISTS. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
TOP