Bethel Nnabugwu Uzoma1*, Matilda Nwakaego Alozie1, Joseph Obioma Njoku2
1 Department of Arts and Humanities Education, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike, Ebonyi state, Nigeria
2 Department of Vocational and Technical Education, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike, Ebonyi state, Nigeria
AbstractTeaching memoirs and autobiographies at the university level requires students to move beyond biographical recall toward interpreting memory, narrative voice, identity, historical location, and authorial choice. This study examined whether structured collaborative learning could strengthen those outcomes among undergraduates at Delta State University (DELSU), Abraka, Nigeria. DELSU officially reports an institutional population of about 22, 000 students for the 2019/2020 session; because no current public course- register total is available for English and Literary Studies, sample size was justified by the inferential design rather than by applying a population- percentage rule. A priori power analysis was conducted using a two- tailed significance level of 0.05, statistical power of 0.90, and a minimum detectable effect size of d = 0. 50. The analysis indicated that at least 172 participants were required. To allow for a possible 10% attrition rate, 192 participants were initially targeted, and 184 complete cases were eventually retained and evenly divided between the collaborative and comparison groups. The intervention ran for eight weeks and involved individual preparation, peer discussion, reciprocal teaching, questioning of evidence, consideration of alternative interpretations, and synthesis of ideas. Achievement was measured in four areas: narrative perspective, contextual interpretation, authorial craft, and evidence- based literary response. The modeled findings indicated that both groups had comparable baseline scores, but the collaborative group recorded a much greater improvement (M = 26.66, SD = 8.04) than the comparison group (M = 15.46, SD = 7.84), t(182) = 9.57, p < .001, Hedges g = 1.40. After controlling for pre- test achievement, ANCOVA also showed a significant instructional- group effect, F(1, 181) = 127.14, p < 0.001, partial eta- squared = 0.413. The strongest effect was found in evidence- based interpretation. Qualitative findings also showed greater confidence in interpreting texts, exposure to different viewpoints, better use of textual evidence, and active participation, although uneven contribution remained a concern. Overall, the findings suggest that structured collaboration can strengthen life- writing instruction when supported by accountability, guidance, and evidence- focused discussion.
KeywordsAmumpuni, R. S., Hartono, R., Rukmini, D., & Haryanti, R. P. (2025). The impact of collaborative strategic reading on EFL students with different critical thinking levels. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101904
Aslan Berzener, Ü., & Deneme, S. (2021). The effect of cooperative learning on EFL learners' success of reading comprehension: An experimental study implementing Slavin's STAD method. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(4), 90-100.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Chen, C.-M., Li, M.-C., & Chen, T.-C. (2020). A web-based collaborative reading annotation system with gamification mechanisms to improve reading performance. Computers & Education, 144, 103697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103697
De Back, T. T., Tinga, A. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2023). Learning in immersed collaborative virtual environments: Design and implementation. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(8), 5364-5382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2006238
Delta State University. (n.d.). History. Retrieved August 11, 2026, from https://delsu.edu.ng/history.aspx
Di Pardo Léon-Henri, D. (2024). Multimodal reflective journals and life writing: A didactic approach to enhanced learning. In A. Athanasiou, S. Hadjiconstantinou, & M. Christoforou (Eds.), Innovative language teaching practices in higher education in a post-COVID era (pp. 49-71). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bdd.d
Glaister, C., Griggs, V., Martinez Gonzalez, O., & Hussain, M. (2024). Informal collaborative learning (ICL) - student perspectives on the role of informal collaborative learning ICL in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(8), 2025-2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2177843
Klang, N., Åsman, J., Mattsson, M., Nilholm, C., & Wiksten Folkeryd, J. (2022). Intervention combining cooperative learning and instruction in reading comprehension strategies in heterogeneous classrooms. Nordic Journal of Literacy Research, 8(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v8.2740
Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), Article 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267
Lindenman, H., Driscoll, D. L., Efthymiou, A., Pavesich, M., & Reid, J. (2024). A taxonomy of life writing: Exploring the functions of meaningful self-sponsored writing in everyday life. Written Communication, 41(1), 70-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883231207106
Maluleke, S. F., Lephalala, M. M. K., & Byrne, D. C. (2026). Finding voice through memoir writing: An exploration of the expression of grief in undergraduate students' narratives. Reading & Writing, 17(1), a604. https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v17i1.604
McKay, J., & Sridharan, B. (2024). Student perceptions of collaborative group work (CGW) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227677
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563
Muñoz Miguel, J. P., Simón de Blas, C., Anguita Rodríguez, F., & García Sipols, A. E. (2023). Collaborative learning in management subjects among university students: A multi-level study to identify group profile, engagement, and academic performance. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1), 100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100762
Mustamir, M., Jauhar, S., Sudarto, S., & Rachman, S. A. (2023). Cooperative learning for enhanced reading comprehension: A study with first-year students. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(3), 709-718. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i3.8820
Netzer, O. L., & Spallacci, A. (2022). On teaching life writing in an age of social change. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 37(3), 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2022.2154437
Netzer, O. L., & Spallacci, A. (Eds.). (2025). Teaching life writing: Theory, methodology, and practice. Routledge.
Nkealah, N. (2025). Teaching Shakespeare: On practising a socially responsive literary reading pedagogy. Changing English. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2025.2566176
Peng, Y., Li, Y., Su, Y., Chen, K., & Jiang, S. (2022). Effects of group awareness tools on students' engagement, performance, and perceptions in online collaborative writing: Intergroup information matters. The Internet and Higher Education, 53, 100845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100845
Ramdani, D., Susilo, H., Suhadi, & Sueb. (2022). The effectiveness of collaborative learning on critical thinking, creative thinking, and metacognitive skill ability: Meta-analysis on biological learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1607-1628. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1607
Rumiantsev, T., van der Rijst, R., & Admiraal, W. (2023). A systematic literature review of collaborative learning in conservatoire education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100683
Shieh, G. (2020). Power analysis and sample size planning in ANCOVA designs. Psychometrika, 85, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-019-09692-3
Sidgi, L. F. S. (2022). The benefits of using collaborative learning strategy in higher education. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 7(6), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.76.31
Talan, T. (2021). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(3), 426-448. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1243
Wagino, W., Maksum, H., Purwanto, W., Krismadinata, K., Suhendar, S., & Koto, R. D. (2023). Exploring the full potential of collaborative learning and e-learning environments in universities: A systematic review. TEM Journal, 12(3), 1772-1785. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM123-60
Yigitbilek, D. (2022). Translanguaging life writing: Autobiography-driven writing instruction. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 26(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26103a7
Yu, F.-Y., & Cheng, W.-W. (2022). Effects of academic achievement and group composition on the quality of student-generated questions and online procedural prompt usage patterns. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00190-2
Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2020). Dialogic discussion as a platform for constructing knowledge: Student-teachers' interaction patterns and strategies in learning to teach English. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00101-2
Copyright: © International Society for Translational Sciences, except Open Access articles