Stephen Olanrewaju ONI*, Sunday Alechenu OBIABO, AFOLABI Anthony Oladele, Audu Godwin
Department of Science Education, Federal University, Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
AbstractStudents’ learning experiences have become more flexible both domestically and internationally in recent years as socioeconomic constraints on higher education sectors have tightened. We just started a Blended Learning Initiative to provide greater freedom and better learning support to our students. Thus, the focus of this research was on integrated learning resources for university students’ academic achievement using a case study on students pursuing educational technology at the Federal University of Oye-Ekiti. The study’s specific goals were to identify the various information sources that students have access to; determine the purpose of information for academic effectiveness; assess how frequently respondents use different information sources; and identify the barriers that limit respondents’ access to sources of information about agricultural science education. The study’s population consisted of all 134 students from the Educational Technology unit of the Department of Science Education at Federal University of Oye Ekiti. The data collected were evaluated using frequency counts, simple percentages, and weighted mean scores. The survey found that respondents mostly rely on lecture notes (x̄ = 4.53), the Internet/online (x̄ = 4.42), and lecturers (x̄ = 4.36) for information. The study revealed that information variation and adoption contribute significantly to the improvement of academic standards at the tertiary Federal University of Oye-Ekiti, and that students are more satisfied with electronic sources of information. The study found limitations such as insufficient current/relevant reading materials and poor guidance/assistance from librarians as limiting students’ access to agricultural science-based knowledge. The study recommended that: continuous training on the use of the library and information be embarked by the University librarians as part of the students’ orientation program; that the learner make use of user-friendly and accessible technology that enhances its simplicity in usage; and those individuals and other corporate organizations are enjoined to provide information-resource centers, as functional ICT/internet facilities to enhance students’ academic development in education.
Abidin, Z. & Saputro, T.M.E. (2020). Google Classroom as a Mathematics Learning Space: Potentials and Challenges. Journal of Physics. Conference Series. 1567 022094.
Chen, W., & Looi, C. (2007). Incorporating Online Discussion in Face-to-Face Classroom Learning: A New Blended Learning Approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 307-326. http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/submission/index.php/AJET/index
Chen, D., & Lu, D. (2019). Exploring Blended Learning Models Supported by Mobile Interactive Technologies in Higher Education: International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 2024, Vol 18, Issue 11, p27.
Duhaney, D. C. (2004). Blended Learning in Education, Training, and Development. Performance Improvement, 43(8), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140430810
Garrison, G., & Kanuka, L. (2004). Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education: The Internet and Higher Education.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2011). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Godfrey Perfectson, O., Otega Prosper, E., & Onwuzo, C. J. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of Blended Learning Models on Higher Education Outcomes: A Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v4i2.535
Hofmann, J. (2006). Why Blended Learning Hasn’t (Yet) Fulfilled Its Promises. In C. J. Bonk & C. R.Graham (Eds.), Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 27-40). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Newcombe, E. (2011, June). A Work in Progress: Refining the “Blend” of Face-to-Face and Online Instruction. Paper Presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011, Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/38304
Norberg, A, Dziuban, C., Moskal P. (2011). A Time-Based Blended Learning Model. On the Horizon, 207-216.
Oyarinde, O.N. & Komolafe, O.G. (2020). Impact of Google Classroom as an Online Learning Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of a Secondary School in Nigeria. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 33(9), 53-61.
Oyegbami, G. A., Oni, S.O., & Olujide, M.K. (2022). Information Dynamics for Effective Academic Performance Among University Students. A Case Study of Agricultural Science Education Students, Federal University Oye-Ekiti. Fuoye Journal of Education FIJED. Vol. 5, No. 1.
Picciano, A. G. (2009). Blending With Purpose: The Multimodal Model. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology (RCET), 5(1), 4-14.
Reeves, T. C. (2003). Storm Clouds on the Digital Education Horizon. Journal of Computing, 15(1), 3-26. http://www.editlib.org/j/ISSN-1042-1726/
Regha, I. O. (2015). Adoption of Blended Learning into the Nigerian Education System: Prospects and Challenges. International Journal of Social Sciences ISSN 2454-5899.
Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs: New Models for Online Learning. EDUCAUSE Review 38(5), 28-38. http://www.educause.edu/ero
Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on Blended Learning in Higher Education. International Journal on E-Learning (IJEL), 6, 81. http://www.editlib.org/j/IJEL/
Waddoups, G. L & Howell, S.L. (2002). Bringing Online Learning to Campus: The Hybridization of Teaching and Learning at Brigham Young University.
Copyright: © International Society for Translational Sciences, except Open Access articles