Journal Browser
Search
View All
Impact of generative artificial intelligence on scientific paper writing and regulatory pathways

Youdong Wang, Jiang Chen*, Yuxin Wu, Xi Yu, Lixia He

Journal Center, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China



Editing Practice 2025, 3(1); https://doi.org/10.54844/ep.2025.1011
Submitted27 Mar 2026
Revised27 Mar 2026
Accepted27 Mar 2026
Published27 Mar 2026
+
Cite This Article
Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI), a key branch of natural language processing, is transforming scientific paper writing. This paper examines its technical features, applications, benefits, and risks and suggests regulatory measures. Generative AI enhances writing efficiency but poses challenges to academic integrity. Future development requires a balance among technical, institutional, and ethical approaches.

REFERENCES
  1. Gulumbe BH. Obvious artificial intelligence-generated anomalies in published journal articles: A call for enhanced editorial diligence. Learn Publ. 2024;37(4):e1626.    DOI: 10.1002/leap.1626

  2. Currie GM. Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: Is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy? Semin Nucl Med. 2023;53(5):719-730.    DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008

  3. Christou CD, Tsoulfas G. Challenges and opportunities in the application of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology and hepatology. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(37):6191-6223.    DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i37.6191

  4. Bouhouita-Guermech S, Gogognon P, Bélisle-Pipon JC. Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics. Front Artif Intell. 2023;6:1149082.    DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1149082

  5. Floridi L, Chiriatti M. GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Mines Mach. 2020;30(4):681-694.    DOI: 10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1

  6. Kim TW. Application of artificial intelligence chatbots, including ChatGPT, in education, scholarly work, programming, and content generation and its prospects: A narrative review. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:38.    DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.38

  7. Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Crit Care. 2023;27(1):75.    DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2

  8. Kacena MA, Plotkin LI, Fehrenbacher JC. The use of artificial intelligence in writing scientific review articles. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2024;22(1):115-121.    DOI: 10.1007/s11914-023-00852-0

  9. Chirichela IA, Mariani AW, Pêgo-Fernandes PM. Artificial intelligence in scientific writing. Sao Paulo Med J. 2024;142(5):e20241425.    DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2024

  10. Chen TJ. ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing. J Chin Med Assoc. 2023;86(4):351-353.    DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000900

  11. Lee PY, Salim H, Abdullah A, Teo CH. Use of ChatGPT in medical research and scientific writing. Malays Fam Physician. 2023;18:58.    DOI: 10.51866/cm0006

  12. Giglio AD, Costa MUPD. The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023;69(9):e20230560.    DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230560

  13. Daungsupawong H, Wiwanitkit V. Artificial intelligence and the scientific writing of non-native English speakers. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024;70(2):e20231291.    DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231291

  14. Ingley SJ, Pack A. Leveraging AI tools to develop the writer rather than the writing. Trends Ecol Evol. 2023;38(9):785-787.    DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.05.007

  15. Selim ASM. The transformative impact of AI-powered tools on academic writing: Perspectives of EFL university students. Int J Engl Linguist. 2024;14(1):14.    DOI: 10.5539/ijel.v14n1p14

  16. Manley K, Salingaros S, Fuchsman AC, Dong X, Spector JA. Using ChatGPT to write a literature review on autologous fat grafting. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025;105:292-304.    DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.04.015

  17. Miao H, Ahn H. Impact of ChatGPT on interdisciplinary nursing education and research. Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 2023;7:e48136.    DOI: 10.2196/48136

  18. Schryen G, Marrone M, Yang J. Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development. Electron Mark. 2025;35(1):13.    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-025-00754-2

  19. Scientists brace for a "flood of junk" papers written with AI help: One researcher estimated more than 1% of all scientific papers published in 2023 involved the use of AI. The Hindu. Updated August 4, 2024. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/scientists-brace-for-a-flood-of-junk-papers-written-with-ai-help/article68515779.ece

  20. Lin JC, Sabet CA, Chang C, Scott IU. Artificial intelligence in medical education assessments: Navigating the challenges to academic integrity. Med Sci Educ. 2024;35(1):509-512.    DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02178-7

  21. Weidmann AE. Artificial intelligence in academic writing and clinical pharmacy education: Consequences and opportunities. Int J Clin Pharm. 2024;46(3):751-754.    DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01705-1

  22. Li P, Huang J, Wu H, Zhang Z, Qi C. SecureNet: Proactive intellectual property protection and model security defense for DNNs based on backdoor learning. Neural Netw. 2024;174:106199.    DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106199

  23. Li K, Wu H, Dong Y. Copyright protection during the training stage of generative AI: Industry-oriented U.S. law, rights-oriented EU law, and fair remuneration rights for generative AI training under the UN's international governance regime for AI. Comput Law Secur Rev. 2024;55:106056.    DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106056

  24. Liebrenz M, Schleifer R, Buadze A, Bhugra D, Smith A. Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: Ethical challenges for medical publishing. Lancet Digit Health. 2023;5(3):e105-e106.    DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00019-5

  25. Inglada Galiana L, Corral Gudino L, Miramontes González P. Ethics and artificial intelligence. Rev Clin Esp (Barc). 2024;224(3):178-186.    DOI: 10.1016/j.rceng.2024.02.003

  26. Keskinbora KH. Medical ethics considerations on artificial intelligence. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;64:277-282.    DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.03.001

  27. Abdullah YI, Schuman JS, Shabsigh R, Caplan A, Al-Aswad LA. Ethics of artificial intelligence in medicine and ophthalmology. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021;10(3):289-298.    DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000397

  28. Pearson GS. Artificial intelligence and publication ethics. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2024;30(3):453-455.    DOI: 10.1177/10783903241245423

  29. American Psychological Association. APA journals policy on generative AI: Additional guidance. American Psychological Association. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/resources/publishing-tips/policy-generative-ai

  30. Princeton University. Disclosing the use of AI. Princeton University Library. Updated January 13, 2025. Accessed June 16, 2025. https://libguides.princeton.edu/generativeAI

  31. Ganjavi C, Eppler MB, Pekcan A, et al. Publishers' and journals' instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: Bibliometric analysis. BMJ. 2024;384:e077192.    DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077192


Copyright: © by the authors. Licensee ISTS. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
TOP