Journal Browser
Search
View All
The "Five Forces Model" and strategies for enhancing the influence of scientific journals

Yongxia Liang1,2,*, Zhongkai Yang3,*, Hong Tian1, Jingjing Liu1,4, Cuixia Li1, Wenjie Dong1

1National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

2Department of Information Resource Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Science and

Technology Beijing, Beijing 100190, China

3School of Public Administration and Policy, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China

4School of Journalism and Communication, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong Province, China



Editing Practice 2024, 2(1); https://doi.org/10.54844/ep.2024.0795
Submitted26 Mar 2026
Revised26 Mar 2026
Accepted26 Mar 2026
Published26 Mar 2026
+
Cite This Article
Abstract

Background: Based on relevant theory of science of science, we aimed to construct a model for evaluating the influence of science journals and thereby propose strategies to enhance their impact. Methods: By using methods such as a literature review, in-depth interviews, and a concept analysis, we considered various aspects related to science journals, including knowledge production, flow, and dissemination, and developed what we call the "Five Forces Model, " along with countermeasures and suggestions. Results: We identified knowledge power, persuasiveness, management power, expressiveness, and dissemination power as the five aspects that determine the influence of science journals. The Five Forces Model was built using these five aspects. Conclusion: Influence development and enhancement are integrated processes among science journals. Theories on knowledge activities need to be utilized effectively to improve a journal's knowledge power. Paradigm theories need to be understood to increase a journal's persuasive ability. The Matthew effect within the scientific community should be given attention to strengthen managerial capacity. Further, the advantages of structural holes should be leveraged for a journal to showcase its expressive capability. Fully recognizing the functions of science journals can help reinforce their dissemination capabilities.

REFERENCES
  1. China Association for Science and Technology, Propaganda Department of CPC Central Committee, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Science and Technology. [Opinions on Deepening Reforms to Cultivate World-Class Scientific and Technological Journals]. China Association for Science and Technology. Updated April 02, 2021. Accessed June 02, 2024. http://www.cast.org.cn/xs/zcfg/YWHD/art/2021/art_3c24b26982554efbac53f672322388c0.html.

  2. [Xi Jinping: Speech at a Scientists' Meeting]. Xinhua. Updated May 03, 2020. Accessed June 02, 2024. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2020-09/11/c_1126483997.htm

  3. Wang HY, Zhou HY, Luo D, Do XN, Zhang H. Bolstering scientific journal influence by improving quality and quantity of articles: Taking Journal of Materials Science & Technology as an example. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2022;33(6):688-695.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202203280214

  4. Wang CY, Wang Z, Chu JX. Does the cover paper help to enhance the influence of academic journals? An empirical study based on four core journals of journalism and communication. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2023;34(7):868-874.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202302220106

  5. Tian Y. [Research on measures and practices to enhance academic influence of sports journals through topic planning: Taking Beijing Sport University Journal as an example]. Public Commun Sci Tech. 2023;15(12):38-43.

  6. Wu LY. The practice of important activities issues of societies to promote the influence of journals. Acta Ed. 2023;35(4):443-446.    DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2023.04.019

  7. Fan ZZ, Li SQ, Li MM, Cai F. Practice and thinking of academic live broadcast to enhance the influence of journals. Acta Ed. 2022;34(5):552-555.    DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2022.05.017

  8. Li RJ, Wang XY, Li YX, et al. Organizing anniversary activities to enhance scientific journals' brand influence. Acta Ed. 2022;34(3):295-300.    DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2022.03.011

  9. Qian JX, Feng CG, Li SC. Building an international academic conference cluster to enhance the brand influence of scientific journals:taking Safety and Environment as an example. Acta Ed. 2024;36(1):103-107.    DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2024.01.020

  10. Fu RH. [The study of journal influence with humanistic quality as an editor: Taking science and technology journals for example]. China Newsp Ind. 2023;(12):56-57.    DOI: 10.13854/j.cnki.cni.2023.12.028

  11. Sun Y. [Yang Wei, a member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences: Enhance the influence of China's scientific journals through open science]. Updated November 11, 2022. Accessed February 05, 2024. https://digitalpaper.stdaily.com/http_www.kjrb.com/kjrb/images/2022-11/02/08/KJRB2022110208.pdf

  12. Liu PP, Yin H. [The role of open access in enhancing the influence of SCI science and technology journals in China]. Sci Tech Publ. 2023;(9):106-113.    DOI: 10.16510/j.cnki.kjycb.20230911.002

  13. Li NN, Li S, Li SN, LY, Li YP. [The impact of philosophical theories on enhancing the influence of scientific and technological journals]. Tianjin Sci Tech. 2024;51(1):130-132.    DOI: 10.14099/j.cnki.tjkj.2024.01.034

  14. Zhao RY, Zhu WJ, Wang XY. [From academic influence to academic voice: a four-dimensional evaluation framework for scientific journals]. China Sci J Res. 2023;34(5):576-583.

  15. Editorial Committee of Guide to Scientific Writing and Editing. Guide to Scientific Writing and Editing. Beijing: Seismological Press; 2010: 81.

  16. Liang YX, Yang ZK. Editors of scientific journals should know something about science of science. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2020;31(4):425-431.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202005240526

  17. Price D. Networks of scientific papers. Sci. 1965;149(3683):510-515.

  18. Latour B, Woolgar S. Zhang BL, Diao XY, trans. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beijing: Dongfang Press; 2004.

  19. Zhao HZ. [Discussion on the mining model of scientific discoveries (Part 1)]. Sci Sci Manag S. T. 1981;2(2):3-5.

  20. Zhao HZ. [Discussion on the Mining Model of Scientific Discovery (Part 2)]. Sci Sci Manag S. T. 1981;2(3):34-38.

  21. Kuhn, TS. Jin WL, Hu XH, trans. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Fourth Edition. Peking University Press; 2012.

  22. Bert. Ren M, trans. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Gaiti Press; 2008.

  23. Ma LP. [Priority of scientific discovery and reward system for science]. Qilu J. 2003;(6):63-67.

  24. Marcuse H. Lin JR, trans. Science and Knowledge in a Social Context. Orient Publishing House; 2001.

  25. [Influence]. 360 Baike. Accessed February 05, 2024. https://baike.so.com/doc/5107174-32364614.html

  26. China Social Sciences Evaluation Institute. China's AMI Comprehensive Evaluation Report of Humanities and Social Sciences Journals (2018). China Social Sciences Evaluation Institute; 2018.

  27. Zhang XM, Xu JJ, Zheng JF, Sun LW. Strategies for organizing big reviews and analysis of their impact. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2021;32(2):194-198.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202009020784


Copyright: © by the authors. Licensee ISTS. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
TOP