The present study analyzed the main characteristics of retracted articles addressing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) published in medical journals in China and abroad. The results are anticipated to provide a reference for the publication and dissemination of articles addressing public health emergencies in the future. Information regarding the retraction of COVID-19 articles was obtained from the Retraction Watch website for the period between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2023. The main characteristics of the withdrawn COVID-19 articles were analyzed according to the distribution of journals, authors, publication period, and the reasons for retraction. Among the 235 COVID-19 articles withdrawn, the main article types were original research and reviews, the main publishers were journals without impact factors and/or preprint platforms, and the authors' countries were mostly China and the United States. The publication period was mainly in 2020 and 2021, and the number of publications is gradually decreasing. The retraction delay was 0–741 days, with a mean delay of 5.9 months. In addition to mistakes from journals/publishers, most of the top reasons for retraction included academic misconduct, especially regarding data and results. The main characteristics of retracted COVID-19 articles included publication on preprint platforms and journals with an impact factor < 5. Furthermore, more retractions were due to journal/publisher errors and academic misconduct. During epidemic situations, such as COVID-19, medical journals should not only improve publishing efficiency, but also strive to strictly control academic quality.

1. The State Council of the People's Republic of China. [Emergency Regulations for Public Health Emergencies]. Accessed November 11, 2023. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2008–03/28/content_6399.htm

2. Wilder-Smith A, Osman S. Public health emergencies of international concern: a historic overview. J Travel Med. 2020;27(8):taaa227.    DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taaa227    PMID: 33284964

3. WHO. [Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic]. Accessed November 15, 2023. https://www.who.int/zh/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.

4. Sha S, Jiang L. [Quick response and social responsibility of medical journals in the period of public health emergency:case study on the outbreak of COVID-19]. Acta Editologica. 2020;32(4):385–389.

5. Ni J, Li P, Liu HX, et al. [Publication characteristics of Chinese and foreign biomedical journals during public health emergencies: Case study on COVID-19 papers]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2021;32(2):262–268.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202008120737

6. Lucas-Dominguez R, Alonso-Arroyo A, Vidal-Infer A, Aleixandre-Benavent R. The sharing of research data facing the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientometrics. 2021;126(6):4975–4990.    DOI: 10.1007/s11192–021–03971–6    PMID: 33935332

7. Zhang W, Leng HM. [Information transmission channels of scientific journals in public health emergencies based on media convergence]. Acta Editologica. 2020;32(5):566–569.

8. Retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers. Accessed November 15, 2023. https://retractionwatch.com/retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/

9. Ren YQ, Jin W, Weng YQ. [New characteristics of academic misconduct in retracted papers and enlightenment]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2019;30(12):1251–1258.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.201903090150

10. List of retracted COVID-19 papers grows past 70. Accessed November 15, 2023. https://retractionwatch.com/2020/12/30/list-of-retracted-covid-19-papers-grows-past-70/

11. Brainard J, You J. What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing's 'death penalty'. Accessed March 23, 2023. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty

12. Xu N, Miao XZ, Chen JX. [Enlightenment of preprint "great prosperity" to academic journals]. Acta Editologica. 2019;31(3):282–289.

13. Xie HJ, Liu XM, Jing R. [Empirical research on the impact of preprint platform bioRxiv and suggestions]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2019;30(11):1218–1224.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.201909110630

14. Kirkham JJ, Penfold NC, Murphy F, et al. Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e041849.    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020–041849    PMID: 33376175

15. Verma AA, Detsky AS. Preprints: a timely counterbalance for big data-driven research. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(7):2179–2181.    DOI: 10.1007/s11606–020–05746-w    PMID: 32141042

16. Kaiser DE, Crossetti MDGO. Open Science and the emergence of preprints. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2021;42:e20210030.    DOI: 10.1590/1983–1447.2021.20210030    PMID: 33852673

17. Irawan DE, Zahroh H, Puebla I. Preprints as a driver of open science: Opportunities for Southeast Asia. Front Res Metr Anal. 2022;7:992942.    DOI: 10.3389/frma.2022.992942    PMID: 36225341

18. Fu JY, He Y. [Token incentive mechanism of self-organizing peer review in preprint]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2021;32(1):23–27.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202005260531

19. Johansson MA, Saderi D. Open peer-review platform for COVID-19 preprints. Nature. 2020;579(7797):29.    DOI: 10.1038/d41586–020–00613–4    PMID: 32127711

20. Massarani L, Neves LFF. Reporting COVID-19 preprints: fast science in newspapers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil. Cien Saude Colet. 2022;27(3):957–968.    DOI: 10.1590/1413–81232022273.20512021    PMID: 35293473

21. Oh HC, Kang H. Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Korean Journal of Internal Medicine perspectives. Korean J Intern Med. 2023;38(3):332–337.    DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2023.099    PMID: 37041691

22. Pradhan P, Pandey AK, Mishra A, et al. Withdrawn: Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag. Accessed November 15, 2023. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

23. Zhang LH, Tian D. [Comparative Analysis of the Retraction Reasons and Time-To-Retraction in Different Disciplines]. Digit Libr Forum, 2019(8):40–44.    DOI: 10.3772/j.issn.1673–2286.2019.08.006

24. Li AD, Zhang X, Liang B. [Analysis on the phenomenon of retracted papers from international scientific journals written by Chinese scholars]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2019;30(10):1034–1038.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.201907080492

25. Wu RL, Deng ZQ, Wu SQ. [Analysis of the reasons for retraction of open access journals from multi-dimensional view: Based on the data from Retraction Watch Database]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2020;31(3):346–355.    DOI: DOI:10.11946/cjstp.201910170709

26. [Elsevier]. Baidu Encyclopedia. Accessed November 15, 2023. https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%88%B1%E6%80%9D%E5%94%AF%E5%B0%94?fromtitle=elsevier&fromid=2357645

27. San Torcuato M, Bautista-Puig N, Arrizabalaga O, Méndez E. Tracking openness and topic evolution of COVID-19 publications January 2020-March 2021:comprehensive bibliometric and topic modeling analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(10):e40011.    DOI: 10.2196/40011    PMID: 36190742

28. Wang JZ, Cui JY, Tan CL, Sun SY. [Investigation and thinking on the online priority publication of COVID-19 research results on CNKI]. Chin J Sci Tech Period. 2020;31(4):483–489.    DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202003070182

29. Zhou HQ, Xiao DB. [A Study on Academic Publication of Public Emergencies in Science and Technological Journals: a Case Study of COVID-19 OA Publication of CNKI]. Publ J. 2020;28(3):59–66.    DOI: 10.13363/j.publishingjournal.2020.03.010

30. Smith MJ, Upshur REG, Emanuel EJ. Publication ethics during public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(7):e1–e2.    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305686    PMID: 32407155